Sunday, 30 March 2008

Upload your videos.

How to upload your videos here ?
  • step1 : create an account on Youtube.
  • step2 : export your video in 640x480 mpeg4 or quicktime with low mp3 audio
  • step3 : upload the file to your Youtube account
  • step4 : paste a link directly on this blog with embeded player
Tips :
  1. "[S]-sitename+yourname" for the video about your site you made for Eddy
  2. "[M]-videoname+yourname" for the video you made for Marie
If you need some help contact me via email. But I won't do the work for you!

Saturday, 29 March 2008

Conférence de Martine Liotard.

Le pdf de la conférence de Martine Liotard (28.03.08) est disponible ici : DOWNLOAD

Wednesday, 26 March 2008

Assignment 2 (French)

Documentaire à produire sur le « Lieu» du projet pour se recadrer dans la perspective du studio « Non-lieux ».

Le but est d’analyser le « lieu» du projet à travers une démarche créative personnelle libérée des toutes contraintes. Votre documentaire doit se faire l’écho d’imageries inconscientes, donnant le ton des sous-titres traduisant l’état des « lieux ».

Cadavre Exquis est une prescription pour assemblage qui invite au jeu comme partie intégrante de la démarche, débouchant sur l’inattendu.

Commencer par un script ou une histoire pour définir méthodes et buts. Votre script devra encoder une série d’actions qui doivent se jouer pour transformer un concept spatial en une réalité. Avant de filmer vous devez penser aux idées clefs que vous aimeriez exprimer et enregistrer. Puis établissez une série d’instructions/ notes de bord à suivre.

Ancre dans votre démarche, votre film ne devient pas seulement une représentation, mais une série d’instructions pour un objet pris hors de son contexte. C’est un processus de déformation pris à l’intérieur d’une démarche itérative. C’est cette possibilité de prescription et d’invention d’une démarche cognitive induisant une réflexivité instructive qui permet la représentation d’un regard particulier.

Chaque étudiant devra employer des techniques surréalistes diverses durant le processus d’élaboration du documentaire. Dans cette démarche vous devez concevoir, produire et filmer la séquence d’une expérience spatiale. Ce « lieux » peu être agrandi, altéré, déformé, ou reconfiguré. Alors, votre documentaire n’est plus simplement une recodification mais un outil d’analyse pour interroger un « lieu» d’une façon différente.

Tenez en compte le rôle joué par le temps, la distance, information, le mouvement et la transformation. Le film engage les paramètres définis par le studio. Les données et les résultats de cet exercice peuvent être le repérage/ démarquage/empreinte amenant de l’extérieur site au film. Idem pour le casting ou le relief existant. Ils doivent apporter des informations qualitatives qui retracent la cartographie du site dans le temps et l’espace.

Le concept, la méthodologie, la fabrication et l’implémentation de votre documentaire doit être bien pensé. Considérer votre site comme un espace à sens multiples qui permet une compréhension de la relation entre le temps et de l’espace.

Quel aspect vous intéresse pour véhiculer la notion de « non-lieux » dans une relation temps/espace ?

Que souhaitez vous analyser pour révéler les aspects du site qu’il serait impossible de faire autrement et qui vous permet de gagner une nouvelle compréhension de sa définition ?

Quels en sont les aberrations ?

Quel sera le format de la présentation et comment sera-t-elle comprise par les autres ?

Requirement:

5 minutes par film pour chaque étudiant. Si vous le faites en équipe la durée sera en relation avec le nombre (X5) …..

i.e. une équipe 4 personnes doit produire un film de 20 minutes.

Surrealist Techniques:

  1. Aerography
  2. Automatism
  3. Bulletism
  4. Calligramme
  5. Collage
  6. Coulage
  7. Cubomania
  8. Cut-up technique
  9. Decalcomania
  10. Dream résumé
  11. Echo poem
  12. Eclaboussure
  13. Entoptic graphomania
  14. Étrécissements
  15. Exquisite corpse
  16. Frottage
  17. Fumage
  18. Games
  19. Grattage
  20. Heatage
  21. Indecipherable writing
  22. Involuntary sculpture
  23. Mimeogram
  24. Movement of liquid down a vertical surface
  25. Outagraphy
  26. Paranoiac-critical method
  27. Parsemage
  28. Photomontage
  29. Soufflage
  30. Surautomatism
  31. Triptography

Tuesday, 25 March 2008

Some Ideas to Help You Interrogate the Non-Lieu

1. When thinking critically about HISTORY, remember:

* history positions us in time

* helps us anticipate the future

* reveals our competence

* reveals the means of resistance

* is ALWAYS a strategy

* is NEVER neutral

* has the power to sanction, censor, raise question

* there is no consensus about what history is or who it is practiced

* is today multidisciplinary and allows for intuition, empathy, memory, experience

* is no longer a grand narrative, but is multifaceted with many centers

* always remember to ask yourself, who’s history is this, who benefits

1a. CIRCULATION: A SOCIAL CONTRACT: circulation preoccupies critics of urban growth and transformation. In Haussmann’s Paris circulation was both a means of urban renovation, a means to get people into the streets (liberty and equality), a means of linking parts of the city together, and the key to privileging the faculty of vision. IT was also considered a poor apology for relentless change, global regulations, and control. REMEmber, circulation is not movement, it is a feature of movement. Circulation is the promise of public health and the failure of the promise. As a social contract, circulation is the relation between conformity and resistance, between the law and the application of the law. Benjamin believed that circulation was the creation of a distance: from past to present, tradition to contemporary life, and authentic experience to a life filled with seductive copies. He was searching for a way to rediscover a creative, responsible life that would reach beyond the political and economic goals of capitalism as they are expressed in the modern metropolis.

2. To go beyond the coercive symmetry of spatial form = spatial praxis:

* look for the fissures in history

* expose the openings and points of stress

* provide a different logic

* consider acts of detournement

* enliven our understanding of physical space

* consider qualities of life that we don’t master

* look for Foucault’s “animal spaces” that alter the terrain of history

* be sensitive to the small gestures in the tissue of everyday life that defy power

* consider how space is moved through, negotiated, and transformed by behavior

3. How to do this, a short list of possibilities -- just the beginning:

* UTOPIA/Eutopus (Good Place): Louis Marin: a threshold/neutral space in which opposing conditions of society coexist. This is the space BETWEEN the past/present; liberty/authority; mobility/dislocation; origins/modernity; memory/forgetting; ..... In this space of neutrality the problem and the resolution occupy the same territory

* COUNTERSPACES: Henri Lefebvre: A counterspace is not the space created by urban planners and engineers. Look to our bodies and the body’s rhythms. Consider how the the body creates connections, flows, intensities, processes, speeds. The body is like no other reality; it has an amplitude that cannot be controlled. The body produces the space it occupies, and sets unpredictable rhythms in motion that overthrow traditional spatial praxis

* WALKING: Michel de Certeau: views the practice of everyday life as the experience of surfaces, energies, links, processes that issue from unprecedented networks; we adapt the environment to our needs. Walking allows for surprises, errors, strange trajectories; it allows up to appropriate space for the moment; is an opportunity for personal resistance; transforms the city; experiments with space; modulates the environment; allows for drifts; creates liberty; produces fictions; and is when we become other than ourselves

* ALLEGORY, A POSTMODERN PERSPECTIVE: Paul de Man and Craig Owens, allegory as a counterspace that resists regulations, exaggerates discontinuity, is always ambiguous. For Owens, public space could be allegorical when it is governed by 1. appropriation 2. site specificity 3. accumulation and may feature impermanence or hybridity. Think about how these qualities of space can influence your understanding of the

non-lieu

* REFLECTION: For Benjamin: the physical space of the city reflects the economic space of capitalism. Benjamin wanted to restore true reflection to collective life. For him, the term describes the distance from day dreaming to self-awareness. Reflection would allow an individual to overcome the distractions and stimulation of consumer life, to be redeemed as an individual. In philosophical thought, Reflection is the capacity to put ourselves at a distance and consider ourselves as the object of inquiry. IN POSTMODERN THOUGHT: For Derrida Reflection is the space of difference, a distance where one idea or concept begins and the other ends. For Derrida, this is NOT a neutral space (as it is for Marin), but a complex interval with specific properties. What happens when we move from one concept to the next--for example, from the lieu to a non-lieu and visa versa. For Derrida this space is never one or the other. There is always overlap and excess. There are no pure concepts. Derrida wants to know what happens in this moment of reflection that leads from one idea to its opposite/to another: From city to body; presence/absence/; insight/domination. How can his understanding of reflection help you consider the non-lieu?

Sunday, 23 March 2008

Assignment 2

The studio is asked to produce a documentary about the “site”. Students should reframe themselves within the premise of the studio – Non-Lieux. The goal is to analyze the “site” through your very own creative process free of conscious constraints. Your documentary should be unconscious echoes of imagery, tone and subtext of the existing conditions.

Exquisite Corpse is a prescription for assemblage invites chance into the process, resulting in the unexpected.

You start with a script or story board to define your methods and goals. Your script should encode series of actions to be performed to make spatial concept a reality. Before your filming, you should think about the key ideas you would like to express and record. Then, set up a set of instructions / story board for yourself or your teammates to follow. Embedded within your process, your movie becomes not merely a representation, but a codified set of instructions for an artifact external to itself. It is a process of deformation within the serial prescriptive process. It is this possibility of prescription and invention-a cognitive feedback loop that allows for vision within visualization.

Each student should employ various surrealist techniques during the process of making the documentary. In this process, you are asked to conceive, produce and film a sequence of spatial experience. The “site” could be augmented, altered, distorted, or re-configured. Thus, your documentary is not merely a recoding but an analytical tool for you to investigate the “site” in a different way.

Consider aspects of time, measurement, datum, movement and transformation. The movie engages the parameters set up by the studio. The input as well as output of this exercise could be also a record/mark/imprint from the site external to the movie itself, i.e. castings, refliefs or models. They must create both quantitative and qualitative data that map the site in time and space.

The concept, design, methodology, fabrication and implementation of your documentary must be well thought out. Consider the site in multiple senses that enable an understanding of time and space. What aspect of are you interested in researching as a vehicle for “scripting” space and time in relation to the notion of Non-Lieux? What is it that you wish to analyze in order to gain an understanding of the site unavailable in a typical site analysis? What are the aberrant conditions? How will the site be augmented, enhance, extended in order to gain a new understanding of context? How will you set up your movie? What manner will the recording of its deployment take? What will be the format of the documentation and how will it be displayed or understood by others?

Requirement:

5 minutes movie for each student

If you do it as a team, the length of the movie will increase accordingly.

i.e. 4 persons team should submit a 20 minutes movie.

Surrealist Techniques:

  1. Aerography
  2. Automatism
  3. Bulletism
  4. Calligramme
  5. Collage
  6. Coulage
  7. Cubomania
  8. Cut-up technique
  9. Decalcomania
  10. Dream résumé
  11. Echo poem
  12. Eclaboussure
  13. Entoptic graphomania
  14. Étrécissements
  15. Exquisite corpse
  16. Frottage
  17. Fumage
  18. Games
  19. Grattage
  20. Heatage
  21. Indecipherable writing
  22. Involuntary sculpture
  23. Mimeogram
  24. Movement of liquid down a vertical surface
  25. Outagraphy
  26. Paranoiac-critical method
  27. Parsemage
  28. Photomontage
  29. Soufflage
  30. Surautomatism
  31. Triptography

Movie list for Non_Lieux

LA FILMS:

CHINATOWN, 1974

BLADE RUNNER, 1982

TERMINATOR, 1984

DIE HARD, 1988

THE PLAYER, 1992

LA CONFIDENTIAL, 1997

THE END OF VIOLENCE, 1997

CRASH, 2005 (COLLISION)

PARIS FILMS:

400 BLOWS

LE DERNIERE METRO

BREATHLESS

AMELIE POULIN

PARIS, JE T’AIME

CHANSONS D’AMOUR

2 JOURS A PARIS

PARIS (KLAPTISCHE)

LA HAINE

L’ESQUIVE

PETITE JERUSALEM

Non-Lieux Films:

City of God

Playtime

Flight Club

Lost in Translation

Sans soleil

La Jetee

Potential sites for Non-Lieux

1. L'ECHANGEUR DE BERCY (PERIPHERIQUE AVEC LE BOULEVARD PONIATOFSKI)

2. PORTE DE PARIS EN ETUDIANT LA RELATION ENTRE VILLE INTRA-MUROS, PERIPHERIQUE ET BANLIEUE .

a. (PORTE DE LA CHAPELLE /BOULEVARD PERIPHERIQUE AUTOROUTE E19)

b. (PORTE DE CLIGNACOURT)

c. (PORTE DES LILAS)

3. UN PROJECT EN BANLIEUE.... (DEFINITION DU LIEU "BAN-LIEU")

4. UN PROJET SUTURE ENTRE PLUSIEURS MILIEUX DE CONTEXTES DIFFERENTS.......(AUTOROUTES, URBANITE, PERIURBANITE ....)

5. SUJET CHOISI PAR L"ETUDIANT.

6. FILM MONTAGE SUR NON- LIEUX (1 equippe max)

7. Courneuve - (website: monte.laster.com under the project name Abondance II)

Short List of Parameters for the Non-Lieux

  1. a consequence of actions taken
  2. the space of paradox, friction
  3. the space in-between contexts
  4. a fragment of something else, which is not resolved or integrated
  5. spaces that exist as a consequence of excess
  6. And NOT the wide open spaces of natural nature, if there is still such a thing on this planet.

Saturday, 22 March 2008

Un site - Ancienne Gare Frigorifique de Paris-Bercy

Une lecture récente.
Un jeune géographe s'interroge sur les blancs des cartes IGN. Il va voir sur le terrain, et découvre des maisons à demi construites et abandonnées, des bandes d’exclusion, des zones franches, des ville-entrepôts, des camps militaires, des bidonvilles...
Un livre blanc, Philippe VASSET, Fayard 2007.

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

Studio Schedule

Location: AMPHI B, Philippe Barriere ; Vendredi de 9.30 à 17.30 et le samedi 9.30 à 14.00 heures (Présence une semaine sur deux). E-mail : pbarrier@ku.edu Eddie Can: Samedi de 9.30 à 17.00 heures. (Toutes les semaines) E-mail : bunkerarch@gmail.com

Sunday, 9 March 2008

Seminar: Course Schedule

READINGS, SCREENINGS, AND INTERVENTIONS BY ARCHITECTS WILL BE ANNOUNCED WEEKLY

Week 1 WHY L.A., Introduction to Megalopolis

March 5

Week 2 Paris, Capital of the 19th Century

March 12 Research Methods: What is history and how does it work?

Week 3 Paris as an Image of the Modern Metropolis

March 19 Research Methods: Analyzing and Interpreting Archival Materials

Week 4 Paris, the center and the edge

March 26

Week 5 WORKSHOPS--NO MEETING

April 2

Week 6 Los Angeles, Capital of the 20th Century

April 9

Week 7 Los Angeles, The Image of the City in Fiction, Media, & Advertising

April 16

Week 8 Los Angeles: Megalopolis as Urban Center: Downtown

April 23 Research Methods: the optic of microstudies—deterioration and revitalization

Week 9 Los Angeles, Megalopolis as Polycentric Urban Fabric: Infrastructure and Sprawl

April 30 Research Methods: the optic of macrostudies—simulation and replication

Week 10 PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW

May 7

Week 11 Paris/Los Angeles, Ethnicity, Urban life, and Youth Culture

May 14

Week 12 Paris/Los Angeles, No Place for the Environment

May 21

Week 13 The Longue Durée: The WORLD City

May 28 Research Methods: analytic for the Global City of the 21st century

Week 14 BREAK BEFORE Final Studio Projects

June 4

Week 15 FINAL STUDIO PROJECTS

June 13/14

Seminar: Key Themes

Metropolis to Megalopolis

Aristotle: People gather in cities first for security, remain for economic opportunity, ultimately stay for ‘the good life(style)’

Ford: “We shall solve the problems of the city by leaving the city” In Fordist economy, the city was the place of labor, industry; in the Post-Fordist economy, it has become the place of information, exchange, and the good life(style)--

Themes/

Megalopolis: City of the 21st Century--Region supersedes City

Consumption/Connectivity supersede Labor/Community

Benjamin on desire, commodity, and shopping place (shop, magazin, arcade, department store) (Arcades Project, 1927-40)

Debord’s theory of the dérive and the reimagining of the city (Theory of the Dérive, 1958)

Baudrillard on the strange mixture of fantasy and desire that is unique to late 20c culture and the city (Consumer Society, 1970)

Koolhaas on New York as the birthplace of the technology of the fantastic (Delirious New York, 1978)

Koolhaas on shopping culture (forthcoming)

Koolhaas on Vegas Guggenheim/Hermitage/Venetian (forthcoming)

definitions

role of polis: society, politics, and consumption [desire becomes duty]

role of urbs: accommodating ever-changing activities and desires spatially

merging of polis and urbs in contemporary city

21c City

historical contextualization

ancient polis and u rbs/medieval town/12-18c city/19c metropolis/20c suburb, megalopolis, megacity/21c aeropolis confusions Los Angeles as ‘non-city’ and New York as artificial centrality, sheer ecstacy of being crowded together, congestion city disappearing into multicentered region/administrative, commercial, entertainment cneters replace cities?

21c model: infinitely expanding metropolitan region replaces autonomous city

regional governance

regional infrastructure

regional resources

regional collaboration

regional culture

regional economy

regional politics

regional environmental concerns

endless sprawl or strategy to stablize edge and re-stablize center

limitations on growth

preservation of wild or uncultivated tracts of land

revitalization of inner city cores or old downtowns, regional centers

emphasis on movement and transportation, global connectivity, consumption of goods and information

typologies

megalopolis

megacities (8,000,000 population or more, defined in 1994)

giant cities

metropoli

midopolises (first-ring suburbs) (Kotkin)

nerdistans (Kotkin)

technoburbs

aeropoli (Kasarda)

administrative centers/capital cities

capitals of information (Krieger, 47): incubators and exporters of innovation

convention cities

museum cities--ancestor, Alexandria

sports cities--ancestor, Olympia

shopping cities (aeropoli)--ancestor, trade cities of ancient Near East

entertainment/leisure cities

retirement cities

economies (social, political, economic)

human infrastructure (labor force, intellectual capital, consumer force)

economies of difference: race, ethnicity

economies of class (balkanization, privitization of infrastructure and municipal services)

economy of object versus economy of commodity or product--status of commodities

[what Walter Benjamin wrote about the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction Baudrillard applied to all reaches of everyday life]

lifestyle

art/architecture

profession

communication

social relations

political realm

city

country

economies of the sign: advertising, marketing, branding

local markets

global markets

retail industry at all levels: cultivating consumption practices

fulfillment logistics

economy of scarcity vis a vis urban context (suburbs are in big supply; city centers dwindling)

economy of place

economy of connectivity

economies of public and private

infrastructures that have defined urban forms through history

alphabet and writing

ancient land and sea trade/travel routes

ancient Roman roads

seaport and harbor systems

river and canal systems

printing

rail systems

telecommunication systems

automobile, truck, and highway and freeway systmes

air travel and cargo systems

electronic, digital, and satellite imaging and information systems

geographies

center/periphery/region distinctions

cores

downtowns

main streets

concentric rings versus gridded urban fabric

horizontal/vertical distinctions

postindustrial landscape (brownfields)

target of sprawl (untouched natural landscape)

deteriorated urban core (infill and revitalization/redevelopment)

deteriorated first-ring suburbs (reinvestment, connectivity, zoning for mixed use)

monotonous, homogenous, banalized suburbs losing appeal to social imagination

scales

macro

micro

autonomous municipal

metropolitan/county

regional

state

national

global

densities (versus congestion)

high and low density distinctions need reversing as city centers have emptied out

densities vary with 9 to 5, weekend, night schedules

population

industry (productive and consumptive)

information (from invisible electronic communication to “visual inflation” of commercial advertising)

strategies for mediation

positive scenarios

positive imaging/branding

rethinking housing

rethinking office/corporate headquarters

rethinking third space (club environment)

reducing economic segregation (racial automatically takes care of itself?)

defining the nature of ‘urbanity’ (how to live in cities)

role of architecture (connectivity as formal problem)

tectonic shifts (in technology and information) have created new urban forms from earlier ones

Athens/polis

Megalopolis/giant city (defensive purpose, centripetal; transportation infrastructure)

Rome/urbs and capital of empire (roads, sea routes)

Paris/metropolis and capital of nation state (railroad systems)

New York/20c modernist city, ‘manhattanism’, vertical city (density, congestion, connectivity)

Mexico City/postmodern megacity and capital of country (Shanghai, Dhaka) (scale)

Hong Kong/generic city; global city (scale)

Los Angeles/capital of megalopolis of so california, horizontality (highways/freeways/airports)

Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)/aeropolis/triport/information technology center of Asia

psychometropolis (Vidler reading)

psyscho-mechanical urbanism (Rem, Delirious, 62)

typologies: forms of suburbanism

Baudelaire’s ‘banlieue’ or suburb

Apollinaire’s ‘zone’ and ‘zonier’, place and inhabitants of unbuilt ground at periphery

sub-urbanism (consumer driven)

extra-urbanism (lifestyle driven)

post-sub-urbanism (lifestyle driven)

technoburb (technology and economy driven)

development of the San Fernando Valley

incorporated into city of Los Angeles, 1915 (doubling size of city, 168 sq mi, 24 mile triangle)

first seen in 1769 by Fr. Juan Crespi

mission San Fernando Rey de Espana founded in 1797

Rancho San Rafael in 1784

Rancho Encino in 1795

Isaias Wolf Hellman, founded Farmers & Merchants bank in 1871

Isaac Lankershim, John B. Lankershim, I.N. Van Nuys cultivated wheat in last quarter of 19c

Pacific Electric Rail introduced in 1903

Los Angeles Aquaduct brought water to truck farmers in 1913

population doubled between 1930 and 1940, explosive growth after WWII

in 1970, if it were an independent city, would have been 6th largest in the nation!!

nature/culture dichotomy

nature/culture/2nd nature

real/simulation/simulacrum

center(s)/edge/periphery

near order (small grid)/far order (big grid)

congestion, density, thickness/thinness

home/office/third space

city as work/oeuvre, mediation between occupants and nature/culture (materialization of the abstract)

city creates and demands new forms of representation

prodution of cultural significance (polis)

physical fabric of city (urbs) (design guidelines)

memory/monuments versus forgetting/erasure and demolition

historical monuments versus infrastructural and architectural monuments

erasure of production versus production of pleasure (sign of need to escape and its impossibility)

Coney Island and Disneyland/Vegas as fetal NY and LA

multiple synthetic realities compensate for disappearance of real city

cultivation of edge as edge (waterfront, desert)

balkanization, race and class, surveillance and security

individual forms, symmetrical but counter

not disappearance, erasure, rupture, but eclipse (repression), survival, transformation

research methods

sources:

historical documentation

photo archives

clippings files

primary and secondary texts (theory, history, interpretation)

social imaginary

fiction

film

television

research paradigms:

urban archaeology origins, transformations, overlaps (myth and memory)(Benjamin, Klein)

diagramming, mapping of topography, geography, architecture, infrastructure, scale (Gottman, Koolhaas)

environmental, sustainabililty studies (McPhee)

ethnologic studies, urban social conditions (of memory, soliltude, difference, crowding) (Davis)

structural and poststructural analysis, forms of signification, spectacle (Lefebvre, Banham, Venturi, Lyotard, Vidler)

dérive: disorientation to reimagine the city, exploration to remap the city (Situationists, Guy Debord)

technological, infrastructural, economic studies/globalization trends (Koolhaas, Olalquiaga, Kotkin et alia)